<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Notes On iTunes LP (Jay Robinson)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/</link>
	<description>Reaching for the sublime in music design (album covers, cd art, record design)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/comment-page-1/#comment-14869</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardformat.org/?p=3803#comment-14869</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s psychological.  I think, on the whole, people who take interest in the larger world of music outside of mainstream Pop *are* clamoring for lossless, because, in one way or the other, it has been reinforced over and over that quality matters somehow.  For years!  Over and over -- be it the musicians, the technicians, the marketers, whatever...buying deluxe box sets of 180g audiophile wax and then immediately taking crappy mp3s sitting down just becuase the quote industry says so is just incongruent in these people&#039;s minds.  Colin and kj, I agree with you mostly, but I side with Simon on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s psychological.  I think, on the whole, people who take interest in the larger world of music outside of mainstream Pop *are* clamoring for lossless, because, in one way or the other, it has been reinforced over and over that quality matters somehow.  For years!  Over and over &#8212; be it the musicians, the technicians, the marketers, whatever&#8230;buying deluxe box sets of 180g audiophile wax and then immediately taking crappy mp3s sitting down just becuase the quote industry says so is just incongruent in these people&#8217;s minds.  Colin and kj, I agree with you mostly, but I side with Simon on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kj</title>
		<link>http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/comment-page-1/#comment-13295</link>
		<dc:creator>kj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardformat.org/?p=3803#comment-13295</guid>
		<description>ummm, 98% of people, including you, the commenters here, i&#039;d wager cannot tell the difference when presented with a blindfold test of AAC vs. 128 MP3 VS. FLAC on their headphones via an ipod. 

i&#039;m in the recording industry and i&#039;ve witnessed or read the results of three of these tests. people are NOT clamoring for FLAC. and btw, it *pains* me to admit this, as a recording professional, cuz i go to great pains to make anything i work on sound the best. but them&#039;s the breaks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm, 98% of people, including you, the commenters here, i&#8217;d wager cannot tell the difference when presented with a blindfold test of AAC vs. 128 MP3 VS. FLAC on their headphones via an ipod. </p>
<p>i&#8217;m in the recording industry and i&#8217;ve witnessed or read the results of three of these tests. people are NOT clamoring for FLAC. and btw, it *pains* me to admit this, as a recording professional, cuz i go to great pains to make anything i work on sound the best. but them&#8217;s the breaks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/comment-page-1/#comment-13291</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardformat.org/?p=3803#comment-13291</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean Simon, but I don&#039;t think the industry is ready for FLAC. Don&#039;t forget even the States is moving towards metered rather than unlimited bandwidth.

Jay, interesting posts you&#039;ve written - the announcement will have clearly disappointed you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean Simon, but I don&#8217;t think the industry is ready for FLAC. Don&#8217;t forget even the States is moving towards metered rather than unlimited bandwidth.</p>
<p>Jay, interesting posts you&#8217;ve written &#8211; the announcement will have clearly disappointed you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jinsai</title>
		<link>http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/comment-page-1/#comment-13288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jinsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardformat.org/?p=3803#comment-13288</guid>
		<description>My thoughts are similar, Jay:
http://jinsai.blogspot.com/2009/08/cmx-see-cocktail-failure.html
and
http://jinsai.blogspot.com/2009/08/cocktail-digital-album-art-failure-in.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts are similar, Jay:<br />
<a href="http://jinsai.blogspot.com/2009/08/cmx-see-cocktail-failure.html" rel="nofollow">http://jinsai.blogspot.com/2009/08/cmx-see-cocktail-failure.html</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://jinsai.blogspot.com/2009/08/cocktail-digital-album-art-failure-in.html" rel="nofollow">http://jinsai.blogspot.com/2009/08/cocktail-digital-album-art-failure-in.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.hardformat.org/3803/some-notes-on-itunes-lp-jay-robinson/comment-page-1/#comment-13284</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardformat.org/?p=3803#comment-13284</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but i felt like stopping reading when the words &quot;high-quality 256kbps AAC format&quot; appeared in the opening paragraph.

Seriously, i&#039;ll *begin* to consider these kinds of gimmicks when the industry realises people want LOSSLESS format. i mean, come on - they&#039;re trying to push a &quot;deluxe&quot; format here - the least one can expect is a lossless option. Until then, not interested, not one tiny little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but i felt like stopping reading when the words &#8220;high-quality 256kbps AAC format&#8221; appeared in the opening paragraph.</p>
<p>Seriously, i&#8217;ll *begin* to consider these kinds of gimmicks when the industry realises people want LOSSLESS format. i mean, come on &#8211; they&#8217;re trying to push a &#8220;deluxe&#8221; format here &#8211; the least one can expect is a lossless option. Until then, not interested, not one tiny little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

